By Fred Nathan

The best state sales tax systems (or gross receipts tax, as it is called in New Mexico) are broad, low, and don't tax necessities, like food.

If tax systems are broad and low, that means that the tax burden is shared widely by different products and services and doesn't fall too heavily on any one product or service. Meanwhile most states avoid taxing necessities so that citizens who live paycheck to paycheck are not forced to choose between paying the rent and putting food on the table.

Unfortunately, New Mexico's gross receipts tax (GRT) is neither broad nor low. At last count, there were 338 exemptions for everything from boxing matches to all-terrain vehicles, and these exemptions significantly narrow the tax base. The GRT also averages more than 7.25 percent across New Mexico, which is relatively high, according to the Tax Foundation.

The one area where New Mexico's GRT gets it right is the fact that, since 2005, New Mexico no longer taxes food or medical services. This was an important reform, since the food tax not only fell on a necessity, it was also very regressive in that it fell hardest on those who could least afford it.

Unfortunately, Bill Fulginiti, the Executive Director of the New Mexico Municipal League, representing all the mayors and city councilors of New Mexico, is proposing to "fix" the food tax, the one thing about New Mexico's GRT that is not broken, by re-imposing it!

New Mexico was the second state to tax food in 1933 during the heart of the Great Depression. (Mississippi was the first.) It was enacted as a "temporary" and "emergency" tax but it hung around for more than seven decades and more than tripled in most places in the state during that period.

When it was finally repealed, the Legislature enacted a "hold harmless" provision to compensate the cities for their lost share of the tax on food. However, in 2013, the legislature phased out the hold harmless payments over a 15-year period and in return gave cities the ability to raise their (non-food) taxes by three-eighths of one percent.

Although Fulginiti clearly has concerns about this change, he never explains why the solution isn't simply to restore the hold harmless payments instead of re-imposing the food tax.

Instead Fulginiti focuses on the impact the food tax would have on low-income New Mexicans. Surprisingly, he claims that the repeal of the food tax "did nothing to help low income New Mexicans" because he argues that they purchase all their groceries with food stamps. That, of course, is simply not true.

Fulginiti relies on the common misperception that food stamps cover the full cost of a low-income family's food needs. Actually, the purpose of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as the Food Stamp Program, is to supplement a family's food budget, not replace it.

The average New Mexican using food stamps receives about $4.09 a day, or about $1.36 per meal, according to a recent analysis by the Legislative Finance Committee.

That is why the federal food stamp benefit formula assumes that families will spend an additional 30 percent of their net income on food in order to afford an adequate diet. As a result, every family receiving food stamps still pays for a large portion of their groceries out of pocket and they benefit from the Legislature's decision to repeal the food tax.

In addition, about 33 percent of families who qualify for food stamps are not enrolled, according to the New Mexico Human Services Department. They constitute more than 130,000 low-income New Mexicans, including tens of thousands of children, who would be paying tax on all of their groceries if the food tax were re-imposed.

Fulginiti also neglects to explain why it makes sense to tax working, middle-class New Mexicans on their purchases of fruits, vegetables and baby food.

Thankfully, not every mayor and city councilor agrees with the Municipal League on the food tax. For example, Santa Fe Mayor Javier Gonzales and the Los Alamos Council have both recently gone on record opposing the re-imposition of the food tax.

Please call your Mayor and city councilor and ask them to go on record opposing the re-imposition of the food tax. Please also visit www.thinknewmexico.org to learn more and go to our Action Center where you can contact your legislators and ask them to also oppose the food tax.

Fred Nathan is Executive Director of Think New Mexico, an independent, statewide, results-oriented think tank which led the effort to repeal the food tax in 2005.

Content on the Beat

WARNING: All articles and photos with a byline or photo credit are copyrighted to the author or photographer. You may not use any information found within the articles without asking permission AND giving attribution to the source. Photos can be requested and may incur a nominal fee for use personally or commercially.

Disclaimer: If you find errors in articles not written by the Beat team but sent to us from other content providers, please contact the writer, not the Beat. For example, obituaries are always provided by the funeral home or a family member. We can fix errors, but please give details on where the error is so we can find it. News releases from government and non-profit entities are posted generally without change, except for legal notices, which incur a small charge.

NOTE: If an article does not have a byline, it was written by someone not affiliated with the Beat and then sent to the Beat for posting.

Images: We have received complaints about large images blocking parts of other articles. If you encounter this problem, click on the title of the article you want to read and it will take you to that article's page, which shows only that article without any intruders. 

New Columnists: The Beat continues to bring you new columnists. And check out the old faithfuls who continue to provide content.

Newsletter: If you opt in to the Join GCB Three Times Weekly Updates option above this to the right, you will be subscribed to email notifications with links to recently posted articles.

Submitting to the Beat

Those new to providing news releases to the Beat are asked to please check out submission guidelines at https://www.grantcountybeat.com/about/submissions. They are for your information to make life easier on the readers, as well as for the editor.

Advertising: Don't forget to tell advertisers that you saw their ads on the Beat.

Classifieds: We have changed Classifieds to a simpler option. Check periodically to see if any new ones have popped up. Send your information to editor@grantcountybeat.com and we will post it as soon as we can. Instructions and prices are on the page.

Editor's Notes

It has come to this editor's attention that people are sending information to the Grant County Beat Facebook page. Please be aware that the editor does not regularly monitor the page. If you have items you want to send to the editor, please send them to editor@grantcountybeat.com. Thanks!

Here for YOU: Consider the Beat your DAILY newspaper for up-to-date information about Grant County. It's at your fingertips! One Click to Local News. Thanks for your support for and your readership of Grant County's online news source—www.grantcountybeat.com

Feel free to notify editor@grantcountybeat.com if you notice any technical problems on the site. Your convenience is my desire for the Beat.  The Beat totally appreciates its readers and subscribers!  

Compliance: Because you are an esteemed member of The Grant County Beat readership, be assured that we at the Beat continue to do everything we can to be in full compliance with GDPR and pertinent US law, so that the information you have chosen to give to us cannot be compromised.