By far the most common comment I receive from county residents opposed to a sale of Gila Regional Medical Center is that we will “lose local control.” When I ask for more specifics about what they are concerned we will lose, the answer is usually something along the lines of “local input into important decisions.”

Until a year or so ago, I strongly shared this belief. I now see it as largely a myth. The local control that means so much to so many Grant Countians is far lesser in scope and far less effective than is commonly believed.

First, our hospital operates in a highly competitive market environment. This greatly constrains the options available to hospital decisionmakers. The hospital must operate as a business and generate several million in net income per year in order to maintain their facility, modernize equipment, recruit talent, and build a reserve to weather downturns. As we have seen recently with the 13 layoffs in the billing office in favor of outsourcing that work to outside of our community, the imperative to maintain a sound bottom line even today constrains the hospital’s ability to keep local jobs, something one might think should be a priority for a locally-owned organization. Earlier examples include the privatization by the GRMC Board of Trustees of home health and hospice care, repeated decisions to postpone bringing our labor and delivery rooms up to modern standards, and cutting support for the Community Health Council. These may have been reasonable decisions given the scarcity of financial resources, but they make the point that local control cannot overcome market pressures. It is ironic that under the current regime of "local control" the hospital cannot protect local jobs while with LifePoint I would anticipate a contractual agreement to do just that.

Second, you don’t really have control when you don’t have information. Because public hospitals such as ours must compete with private hospitals, New Mexico law specifically exempts them from the Open Meetings Act. This is appropriate; why should private businesses gain competitive advantage from forcing public hospitals to reveal their confidential business information? But as a result, only the hospital’s Board of Trustees and its top management – not the public or even the County Commission -- are privy to the kind of information one needs to provide effective input into important decisions. In some past administrations, it appears that even the Board of Trustees did not have all the information it needed to keep the hospital on course.

Third, even if we had complete and reliable information, we – the Commission, the public, the medical community – couldn’t reliably influence the Board’s decisions. Under New Mexico’s Hospital Funding Act, the Board of Trustees is not accountable to any entity, including the County Commission. The Commission appoints trustees, but the Act specifies that, “after their appointment, none of the members of the hospital governing board shall be removed except for cause specified in a written charge and after full public hearing on the charge.” If the legal structure doesn’t convince you that this is the case, I’ve got two words for you: Cancer Center. No amount of individual, group, or community-wide pressure was able to dissuade the Board from following its path to disaster, even though we could all see for at least a year that it would indeed be a disaster. The Board of Trustees is so immune to outside influence that the Commission has no recourse to address mismanagement even if it threatens to bankrupt the hospital.

I have another example for you. If the hospital’s Board of Trustees truly represented the community, it would have been willing to explore, together with the County Commission, alternative forms of ownership. If it truly represented the community, it would have had the exact same interest we had – ensuring Grant County has the strongest hospital providing the widest array of high-quality services possible. Exploring options does not require abandoning one’s preferences, just a willingness to learn. Instead, the Board remained willfully ignorant of all options other than the status quo. Both its statement early in the process that it would not consider other structures, and its recent refusal to meet with LifePoint to hear what the company has to offer and to question them about it, have given me the perception that the hospital Board has confused the community’s interests with those of the hospital’s top management and that it is incapable of steering the hospital through the innovations that will be needed to survive in the long run.

What this leaves is “local control” only in the sense that the members of the autonomous, unaccountable Board of Trustees are Grant County residents. In terms of true local control, is this actually better than the local Advisory Board that LifePoint would establish? In fact, the local Advisory Board proposed by LifePoint would include local elected officials, so we would no longer be excluded from hospital board meetings. The medical community would have not just two members on the board, but half of the board, allowing for much more input into the hospital’s strategic planning process – which is an annual exercise in LifePoint’s hospitals. LifePoint’s local board would take the lead on strategic planning, which is the process that identifies areas where investment is needed. And it would have reasonable veto power over any new CEO proposed by corporate HQ. (No, LifePoint’s local board would not have final say on investment decisions – that would remain in Tennessee, which is a concern for me. But I am also aware that having an out-of-state corporation make final decisions about how to invest capital they are contractually committed to investing is better than having a local board figuring out what to cut because there’s not enough money.)

In summary, one of the most important questions we need to answer to make this decision is whether the exchange of the current unaccountable Board of Trustees for a local Advisory Board involves a loss of local control significant enough to outweigh the gains in financial, technological, legal, and human resources we would see from a sale to LifePoint.

Harry Browne
Grant County Commissioner, District 5

Live from Silver City

Join GCB Three Times Weekly Updates

Welcome to Three Times Weekly Updates! You will be subscribed to email notifications with links to recently posted articles.
You can unsubscribe anytime. We never share or rent your email to anyone.

Fire Alerts

Editor's Note

Check out Pets to Adopt. The High Desert Humane Society has some new cats and dogs up for adoption.

Those new to providing news releases to the Beat are asked to please check out submission guidelines at https://www.grantcountybeat.com/about/submissions. They are for your information to make life easier on the readers, as well as the editor.

Classifieds: We have changed Classifieds. Check periodically to see if any news ones have popped up. The former software failed us, so it's just a category now, with prices posted. Send your information to editor@grantcountybeat.com and we will post it as soon as we can. Instructions and prices are on the page.

Images: We have received complaints about large images blocking parts of other articles. If you encounter this problem, click on the title of the article you want to read and it will take you to that article's page, which shows only that article without any intruders. It's a software problem, not easily fixable, other than showing fewer articles per summary page. If you are a frequent visitor, you might not mind fewer articles per page, but if you only come once in a while, you likely want to see more articles to browse. Write me at editor@grantcountybeat.com to let me know your feelings on this issue. 

Compliance: Because you are an esteemed member of The Grant County Beat readership, be assured that we at the Beat continue to do everything we can to be in full compliance with GDPR and pertinent US law, so that the information you have chosen to give to us cannot be compromised. 

New Columnists: The Beat continues to bring you new columnists. And check out the old faithfuls who continue to provide content.

The Beat has a column for you gardeners out there. The Grant County Extension Service will bring you monthly columns on gardening issues. The first one posted is on Winterizing your houseplants and patio plants.

The Beat totally appreciates its readers and subscribers!  


All articles and photos indicated by a byline are copyrighted to the author or photographer. You may not use any information found within the articles without asking permission AND giving attribution to the source. Photos can be requested and may incur a nominal fee for use personally or commercially.

NOTE: If an article does not have a byline, it was sent to the Beat and written by someone not affiliated with the Beat

Don't forget to tell advertisers that you saw their ad on the Beat.

Newsletter: If you subscribe to the Join GCB Three Times Weekly Updates option on the left side of this page, you will be subscribed to email notifications with links to recently posted articles.

Here for YOU: Consider the Beat your DAILY newspaper for up-to-date information about Grant County. It's at your fingertips! One Click to Local News.

Feel free to notify editor@grantcountybeat.com, if you notice any technical problems on the site. Your convenience is my desire for the Beat. 

Disclaimer: If you find errors in articles not written by the Beat team but sent to us from other content providers, please contact the writer, not the Beat. For example, obituaries are always provided by the funeral home or a family member.

We can fix errors, but please give details on where the error is so we can find it. News releases from government and non-profit entities are posted generally without change, except for legal notices, which incur a small charge.

Thanks for your support for and your readership of Grant County's online news source—www.grantcountybeat.com