Holloman AFB proposes to; Alternative 1 - expand existing Talon Military Operations Area (MOA) and associated Air Traffic Controlled Assigned Airspace (ATCAA) Special Use Airspace (SUA) or Alternative 2 - reconfiguring and expanding the Cato/Smitty MOA and associated ATCAA and/or creating a new Lobos MOA/ATCAA SUA. The Air Force holds the view that “Optimizing Air Force controlled SUA would provide the scheduling flexibility necessary to conduct multiple, simultaneous training missions needed by the aircrews stationed at Holloman AFB, New Mexico to meet the pilot initial qualification training requirements (NOI Federal Register August 25, 2017).” However, is this statement by the US Air Force factual, can Holloman AFB F-16 training be conducted utilizing existing airspace MOAs and associated ATCAA SUAs as identified in the NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) Environmental Assessments and resultant Findings of No Significant Impacts?

In July 2011 Holloman AFB submitted an NEPA Environmental Assessment for “Recapitalization of the 49 Fighter Wing Combat Capabilities and Capacities.” This relocated two F-16 training squadrons consisting of fifty-six F-16s from Luke AFB to Holloman AFB following the departure of the F-22 aircraft. The Environmental Assessment noted that “Overall, any increased use of the Special Use Airspace and Military Transport Routes under the Proposed Action would have no adverse impacts on the use and management of the training airspace within this region. The existing airspace structure would meet the F-16 training requirements without the need to expand this structure or establish new airspace to accommodate those mission activities. Therefore, the airspace environment is in place to support Air Force and Army test and training operations in this area and would be sufficient to accommodate F-16 operations. (Holloman AFB July 2011).” The Holloman AFB “Finding of No Significant Impact” required no additional airspace modifications and training operations continued successfully meeting the requirements of the training syllabus.

In May 2017 Holloman AFB submitted a NEPA Environmental Assessment for “Interim Relocation of Two F-16 Squadrons”. This relocated two squadrons of F-16s currently based at Hill AFB, Utah, to Holloman AFB existing F-16 training unit and would be temporary in nature pending a final location decision, “allowing an increase in fighter pilot production (Holloman AFB May 2017)”. The decision to relocate the F-16s to Holloman AFB was based in part, on “The New Mexico Training Range Initiative (NMTRI) Environment Impact Statement (EIS) Statement (Cannon AFB 2006) which assessed New Mexico airspace for F-16 training and the Pecos MOA complex was expanded east, west, and south to conform with the overlying Sumner ATCAA. This EIS evaluated F-16 training operations and requirements for the 27th Fighter Wing (Cannon AFB) and the New Mexico Air National Guard, sorties that are not flown in 2017 due to installation realignments and mission changes. The airspace evaluated for NMTRI sorties, however, does support F-16 Formal Training Unit operations and is available to meet flying requirements should forty-five F-16 aircraft relocate from Hill AFB to Holloman (Holloman AFB May 2017).” “Per the NMTRI EIS (Cannon AFB, 2006), Holloman AFB has access to the additional airspace required to meet increased F-16 training requirements, and underutilized airspace can support the additional required training time (Holloman May 2017).” “No mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to airspace would be required to support the interim relocation of additional F-16 Formal Training Unit operations to Holloman AFB (Holloman AFB May 2017).” The Holloman AFB “Finding of No Significant Impact” required no additional airspace modifications and training operations continued successfully meeting the requirements of the training syllabus, however, restricted airspace time lost to White Sands Missile Range test mission was a concern.

In July 2017 Holloman AFB submitted a NEPA Environmental Assessment for “F-16 Use in White Sands Missile Range (WSMR) R-5111 C/D Airspace.” The “purpose and need of this Proposed Action are to maximize the F-16 training use to the full extent of restricted airspace in the vicinity of Holloman AFB. R-5111 C/D is the only restricted airspace not in use by F-16s that can support Holloman AFB’s need to increase pilot production. (Holloman AFB July 2017)”. If this EA finds that the F16 training sorties in R-5111 C/D will not result in significant impacts to human health or the environment, this airspace can become available for F-16 pilot training. In that case, R-5111 A/B/C/D, combined, would provide adequate space for syllabus-required maneuvers to help make up for restricted airspace time lost to WSMR test missions (Holloman July 2017).” This Environmental Assessment is waiting on final disposition.

The Holloman AFB July 2011 and May 2017 NEPA Environmental Assessments and resultant “Findings of No Significant Impact” have demonstrated that Military Operations Areas and associated Air Traffic Controlled Assigned Airspace Special Use Airspace are available to meet the requirements of the syllabus for F-16 aircraft training at Holloman AFB. A review of the NEPA Environmental Assessment documents resulted in the identification of the following airspace that is available for F-16 training, however, not utilized: Bronco 1/2/3, Cato, Pecos south/North low/North High, Valentine, R-5111 C/D and Smitty. The NEPA draft Environmental Assessment for airspace R-5111 C/D is in review and if approved, will mitigate the US Airforce concerned of “restricted airspace time lost to White Sands Missile Range test missions.” Both the Holloman AFB July 2011 and May 2017 Environmental Assessments and resultant “Finding of No Significant Impact,” did not identify nor state there was inadequate training airspace or that trained fighter pilot production would not be met. Holloman AFB has the required airspace, can conduct simultaneous training missions and needs to stay out of the Gila National Forest and Wilderness areas.

Todd North
Silver City, NM

 

Content on the Beat

WARNING: All articles and photos with a byline or photo credit are copyrighted to the author or photographer. You may not use any information found within the articles without asking permission AND giving attribution to the source. Photos can be requested and may incur a nominal fee for use personally or commercially.

Disclaimer: If you find errors in articles not written by the Beat team but sent to us from other content providers, please contact the writer, not the Beat. For example, obituaries are always provided by the funeral home or a family member. We can fix errors, but please give details on where the error is so we can find it. News releases from government and non-profit entities are posted generally without change, except for legal notices, which incur a small charge.

NOTE: If an article does not have a byline, it was written by someone not affiliated with the Beat and then sent to the Beat for posting.

Images: We have received complaints about large images blocking parts of other articles. If you encounter this problem, click on the title of the article you want to read and it will take you to that article's page, which shows only that article without any intruders. 

New Columnists: The Beat continues to bring you new columnists. And check out the old faithfuls who continue to provide content.

Newsletter: If you opt in to the Join GCB Three Times Weekly Updates option above this to the right, you will be subscribed to email notifications with links to recently posted articles.

Submitting to the Beat

Those new to providing news releases to the Beat are asked to please check out submission guidelines at https://www.grantcountybeat.com/about/submissions. They are for your information to make life easier on the readers, as well as for the editor.

Advertising: Don't forget to tell advertisers that you saw their ads on the Beat.

Classifieds: We have changed Classifieds to a simpler option. Check periodically to see if any new ones have popped up. Send your information to editor@grantcountybeat.com and we will post it as soon as we can. Instructions and prices are on the page.

Editor's Notes

It has come to this editor's attention that people are sending information to the Grant County Beat Facebook page. Please be aware that the editor does not regularly monitor the page. If you have items you want to send to the editor, please send them to editor@grantcountybeat.com. Thanks!

Here for YOU: Consider the Beat your DAILY newspaper for up-to-date information about Grant County. It's at your fingertips! One Click to Local News. Thanks for your support for and your readership of Grant County's online news source—www.grantcountybeat.com

Feel free to notify editor@grantcountybeat.com if you notice any technical problems on the site. Your convenience is my desire for the Beat.  The Beat totally appreciates its readers and subscribers!  

Compliance: Because you are an esteemed member of The Grant County Beat readership, be assured that we at the Beat continue to do everything we can to be in full compliance with GDPR and pertinent US law, so that the information you have chosen to give to us cannot be compromised.