By Mary Alice Murphy

The Gila/San Francisco Water Commission held a special meeting today to finalize and approve a resolution, which had been discussed at the meeting held Oct. 21.

With commissioners representing nine entities and three on the conference call, representing four entities, the group had a quorum.

Charles "Tink" Jackson, representing Luna County and the village of Columbus, moved to approve the resolution, which was read by GSFWC Chairman Anthony Gutierrez, and Janice Kiehne, representing the 1892 Luna Ditch Association in Catron County, seconded the motion.

GSFWC Treasurer Alex Thal, who represents the Grant Soil and Water Conservation District, had questions. "Shouldn't we put in the 'Now, Therefore' that these recommendations are being made to the Interstate Stream Commission?"

Kiehne asked if that were not what was in the first Whereas. Thal said it should be stated in the Therefore, be it resolved, portion of the resolution.

Jackson amended his motion to include the language, "and that these priorities be recommended to the Interstate Stream Commission. Kiehne seconded it.

Billy Webb, representing the San Francisco Soil and Water Conservation District suggested that No. 8, the San Francisco Watershed Restoration proposal, should be moved under the category, Diversion, as it had a storage component to the project.

Darrel Allred of Catron County said he had been the coordinator of the San Francisco Project for the irrigation portion. "There were 10 different proposals. Every one of the projects had money allocated for off-stream storage of Arizona Water Settlements Act water. I think it would be fair to allow us to divert. I request that No. 8, be moved into the diversion category."

Gutierrez said the diversion category was chosen to use the 14,000 acre-feet of water, as allocated by the AWSA.

"I think the ISC said our proposals would improve water delivery and would store water, if it were available," Allred said.

Thal said diversion should be clarified, as the only part of the proposals that would tap into the average annual 14,000 acre-feet of water. "We chose No. 1 under the category Diversion, because it would tap into the 14,000 acre-feet and because No. 1 (the Southwest Regional Water Supply Project, also known as the Deming Diversion) would offer the greatest good for the greatest number of citizens."

Jackson amended his motion to include Allred's request. Kiehne asked if only the ditches listed in the proposal would be funded or improved.

Thal said the language of the San Francisco proposal includes the 4,000 acre-feet allocated to the San Francisco Basin and also has language in it that leaves it open for any and all irrigation projects.

Kiehne seconded the amendment.

Jim Massengill, representing Deming, asked if the proposals were listed under project type from highest to lowest, because of the rating made in the 2012 resolution, upon which the new resolution was based.

Gutierrez said they were ranked in the order in each category of their ranking in the 2012 resolution, and each remains an individual project.

Webb asked that the No. 8 San Francisco project be moved to No. 5, Jackson amended his second amendment and Kiehne seconded.

Jackson noted that each project might not be paid at 100 percent, with some being funded partially.

Gutierrez repeated the original motion; the second motion, which was the first amendment to add language as being recommendations to the ISC; and the third motion as the second amendment moving the San Francisco Watershed project to No. 5, and moving the numbers down below that.

Discussion ensued on where the San Francisco proposal should be placed in the Diversion category. It was finally decided to leave it at No. 5, because of where it had ranked in the 2012 resolution.

"I call for a vote on the motion, as amended," Gutierrez said.

The resolution passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned.

Content on the Beat

WARNING: All articles and photos with a byline or photo credit are copyrighted to the author or photographer. You may not use any information found within the articles without asking permission AND giving attribution to the source. Photos can be requested and may incur a nominal fee for use personally or commercially.

Disclaimer: If you find errors in articles not written by the Beat team but sent to us from other content providers, please contact the writer, not the Beat. For example, obituaries are always provided by the funeral home or a family member. We can fix errors, but please give details on where the error is so we can find it. News releases from government and non-profit entities are posted generally without change, except for legal notices, which incur a small charge.

NOTE: If an article does not have a byline, it was written by someone not affiliated with the Beat and then sent to the Beat for posting.

Images: We have received complaints about large images blocking parts of other articles. If you encounter this problem, click on the title of the article you want to read and it will take you to that article's page, which shows only that article without any intruders. 

New Columnists: The Beat continues to bring you new columnists. And check out the old faithfuls who continue to provide content.

Newsletter: If you opt in to the Join GCB Three Times Weekly Updates option above this to the right, you will be subscribed to email notifications with links to recently posted articles.

Submitting to the Beat

Those new to providing news releases to the Beat are asked to please check out submission guidelines at https://www.grantcountybeat.com/about/submissions. They are for your information to make life easier on the readers, as well as for the editor.

Advertising: Don't forget to tell advertisers that you saw their ads on the Beat.

Classifieds: We have changed Classifieds to a simpler option. Check periodically to see if any new ones have popped up. Send your information to editor@grantcountybeat.com and we will post it as soon as we can. Instructions and prices are on the page.

Editor's Notes

It has come to this editor's attention that people are sending information to the Grant County Beat Facebook page. Please be aware that the editor does not regularly monitor the page. If you have items you want to send to the editor, please send them to editor@grantcountybeat.com. Thanks!

Here for YOU: Consider the Beat your DAILY newspaper for up-to-date information about Grant County. It's at your fingertips! One Click to Local News. Thanks for your support for and your readership of Grant County's online news source—www.grantcountybeat.com

Feel free to notify editor@grantcountybeat.com if you notice any technical problems on the site. Your convenience is my desire for the Beat.  The Beat totally appreciates its readers and subscribers!  

Compliance: Because you are an esteemed member of The Grant County Beat readership, be assured that we at the Beat continue to do everything we can to be in full compliance with GDPR and pertinent US law, so that the information you have chosen to give to us cannot be compromised.