By Mary Alice Murphy

Gila National Forest Supervisor Adam Mendonca opened the meeting and introduced the facilitator Heather Bergman.

"This is a different sort of meeting," Mendonca said. "We are looking for specific input for the ongoing forest plan revision."

Those present were given clickers to choose with yes, no of unsure if the range of alternatives for each item considered included what most concerned them. If not, they were asked to write down what they thought important but was outside the range of alternatives.

Matt Schultz, forest planner for the Gila, said the GNF is in the process of revisiting the plan from 1986. The ongoing process began in 2015, and it continues today. "The nature of forest plans are to develop a plan to reach the desired conditions, which can be diverse. Although it has been amended since the last one completed in 1986, the forest has seen significant changes over the years. We've been having a slew of technical meetings. We are in Phase 2 of the revision. Although we have a variety of opinions, we have discovered quite a bit of common ground. We have only a handful of issues that have different perspectives. Those are the ones we will address this evening."

He noted that when an alternative states "no action," it means the forest will continue using that part of the 1986 plan.

"The forest supervisor will make reasoned choices among the alternatives based on the analyses," Schultz said. "What we are going to be talking about tonight is where there were multiple perspectives. You are to answer whether your perspective is within the range of alternatives. These are contentious issues."

Schultz also explained the language of standards and guidelines. Standards are mandatory; guidelines have restraints, but also allow more flexibility.

"We are looking for things outside the range of alternatives presented this evening," Schultz continued. "We are trying to move toward desired conditions. The preliminary draft plan is still open for comment."

Mendonca said the standards and guidelines can be made at the forest level or even in particular areas of the forest.

A couple of test questions offered the opportunity for participants to determine if they understood the process. One addressed which street became the Big Ditch in downtown Silver City and the second addressed Grant County Sheriff Harvey Whitehill and what future famous outlaw he became the first to arrest. The correct answers were, respectively, Main Street and Billy the Kid.

livestock grazing alternativesLivestock grazing range of alternativesThe first real question addressed livestock grazing. It showed a range from fewer hard rules (standards), more management options (flexibility) through balance of hard rules and management options to more restrictions placed on permittees, with the left-most one (fewer standards) increasing flexibility and the right-most one, more standards being more restrictive.

The question asked: "Is your perspective on this issue represented in the range below?" The choices were Yes, No or Not sure. For No or Not sure answers, Bergman requested those choosing the answers to explain verbally or in writing what they felt had been left out.

A series of questions followed, with clicker input by the participants.

The second question addressed vacant grazing allotments, with ranging, on the left, no vacant allotments and issue permits for vacant allotments through the range to use to increase flexibility and allow current permit holders to use during times of need to the right end of the range to keep them vacant and unused or even remove from grazing and use for wildlife and watershed.

The third question addressed riparian management from the left to keep the use of livestock grazing in riparian areas but use adaptive management and best managements practices to move toward and/or maintain desired conditions to the right-most option of phase out grazing in riparian areas and increase distance buffered from new road construction.

Next was vegetation types to focus restoration efforts on from on the left grasslands and open woodlands (to the exclusion of other types) through a mix of grasslands, woodlands and forest/timberland types to, on the right, forest/timberland (to the exclusion of other types).

Next were restoration tools to use from the left part of the range, which had rely on mechanical methods, limit prescribed fire and herbicide use on noxious, invasive species and resprouting alligator juniper and evergreen oak through using a mixture of mechanical prescribed fire and wildfire to the right end of the range with rely on prescribed fire and wildfire only, exception for mechanical in the wildland urban interface, and herbicide use on noxious, invasive species only.

The question on land adjustments ranged from acquire desirable lands for public access and resource management when available and when possible dispose of isolated, unmanageable lands to lands that support community development to, on the right side of the range, more emphasis would be directed toward land exchanges so that no-net loss of private property value in a county occurred.

The amount of recommended wilderness ranged from, on the left, no new recommended wilderness through some new recommended wilderness taking into consideration other forest uses and restoration needs to on the right side of the range a significant amount of new recommended wilderness.

The last question addressed the amount of botanical areas and ranged from, on the left, no botanical areas through some area in botanical areas for rare plant conservation and education to, on the right, more area in botanical areas for rare plant conservation and education.

Schultz asked if any other topics should be considered for a range of alternatives.

The next steps, according to Schultz, are to reconsider the preliminary range of alternatives, conduct an analysis of the alternatives, release and draft plan and draft environmental impact statement for feedback in 2019 and revise those documents based on feedback.

Beth Ihle, the temporary Silver City District ranger, who will be returning as the permanent ranger in November, said: "You saw the sausage making this evening. You've seen how we work through the process."

 

Content on the Beat

WARNING: All articles and photos with a byline or photo credit are copyrighted to the author or photographer. You may not use any information found within the articles without asking permission AND giving attribution to the source. Photos can be requested and may incur a nominal fee for use personally or commercially.

Disclaimer: If you find errors in articles not written by the Beat team but sent to us from other content providers, please contact the writer, not the Beat. For example, obituaries are always provided by the funeral home or a family member. We can fix errors, but please give details on where the error is so we can find it. News releases from government and non-profit entities are posted generally without change, except for legal notices, which incur a small charge.

NOTE: If an article does not have a byline, it was written by someone not affiliated with the Beat and then sent to the Beat for posting.

Images: We have received complaints about large images blocking parts of other articles. If you encounter this problem, click on the title of the article you want to read and it will take you to that article's page, which shows only that article without any intruders. 

New Columnists: The Beat continues to bring you new columnists. And check out the old faithfuls who continue to provide content.

Newsletter: If you opt in to the Join GCB Three Times Weekly Updates option above this to the right, you will be subscribed to email notifications with links to recently posted articles.

Submitting to the Beat

Those new to providing news releases to the Beat are asked to please check out submission guidelines at https://www.grantcountybeat.com/about/submissions. They are for your information to make life easier on the readers, as well as for the editor.

Advertising: Don't forget to tell advertisers that you saw their ads on the Beat.

Classifieds: We have changed Classifieds to a simpler option. Check periodically to see if any new ones have popped up. Send your information to editor@grantcountybeat.com and we will post it as soon as we can. Instructions and prices are on the page.

Editor's Notes

It has come to this editor's attention that people are sending information to the Grant County Beat Facebook page. Please be aware that the editor does not regularly monitor the page. If you have items you want to send to the editor, please send them to editor@grantcountybeat.com. Thanks!

Here for YOU: Consider the Beat your DAILY newspaper for up-to-date information about Grant County. It's at your fingertips! One Click to Local News. Thanks for your support for and your readership of Grant County's online news source—www.grantcountybeat.com

Feel free to notify editor@grantcountybeat.com if you notice any technical problems on the site. Your convenience is my desire for the Beat.  The Beat totally appreciates its readers and subscribers!  

Compliance: Because you are an esteemed member of The Grant County Beat readership, be assured that we at the Beat continue to do everything we can to be in full compliance with GDPR and pertinent US law, so that the information you have chosen to give to us cannot be compromised.