WASHINGTON – In a speech on the Senate floor, U.S. Senator Tom Udall today urged the Senate to pass the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) with tribal provisions to protect Native American women from domestic abuse.

To watch Udall's speech, click here.

Since VAWA's passage, domestic violence has decreased by over 50 percent. Yet, 1 in 3 Native women will be sexually assaulted in her lifetime, and Native women are victims of domestic violence at a disproportionately higher rate. The VAWA provisions would help tribal courts prosecute domestic violence and provide resources to address violence on tribal lands.


Below are Udall's remarks as prepared for delivery:

Mr. President,

I rise today to express my support for the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act. It's important that we're doing this early in the 113th Congress. And unfortunate that we have to have this debate again. The Senate passed a nearly identical bill last April. A bill with strong bipartisan support. But the House failed to bring it up for a vote, allowing the law to expire at the end of last year.

Many House Republicans opposed the Senate bill because it expanded VAWA's protections to three groups – gays and lesbians, Native Americans, and undocumented immigrants. I support all three of these expansions, and today I want to again stress how crucial this measure is for Native American women.

For the past 19 years, the Violence Against Women Act helped protect women. From domestic violence. From sexual assault. And from stalking. This historic legislation has strengthened the prosecution of these crimes, and it has provided critical support to the victims.

VAWA has long been bipartisan with broad support. Democrats, Republicans, law enforcement officers, prosecutors, judges, health professionals, all have supported this legislation. Why? Because it worked.

Since VAWA's passage in 1994, domestic violence has decreased by over 50 percent. And the victims of these crimes have been more willing to come forward. Knowing that they are not alone. Knowing that they will get the support they need. Knowing that crimes against women will not be tolerated.

Mr. President, unfortunately, not all women have received the full benefits of the Violence Against Women Act. That is why the tribal provisions now are so important. Native American women are two and a half times more likely than other U.S. women to be victims of rape.  One in three will be sexually assaulted in their lifetimes. And it is estimated that three out of every five Native women will experience domestic violence. 

Those numbers are tragic. Those numbers tell a story of great human suffering. Of women in desperate situations. Desperate for support. And too often we have failed to provide that support.

The frequency of violence against Native women is only part of the tragedy. Too often, these crimes go unprosecuted and unpunished. Not only is violence inflicted, but justice is denied.

Here's the problem. Tribal governments are unable to prosecute non-Indians for domestic violence crimes. They have no authority over these crimes against Native American spouses or partners within their own tribal lands. Instead, under existing law, these crimes fall exclusively under federal jurisdiction. But federal prosecutors have limited resources. They may be located hours away from tribal communities. Non-Indian perpetrators often go unpunished. And yet over 50 percent of Native women are married to non-Indians. 76 percent of the overall population living on tribal lands are non-Indians.

The result is an escalating cycle of violence. On some tribal lands, the homicide rate for Native women is up to 10 times the national average.  Ten times the national average. But this starts with small crimes. Small acts of violence that may not rise to the attention of a federal prosecutor. In 2006 and 2007, U.S. Attorneys prosecuted only 45 misdemeanor crimes on tribal lands. For perspective, the Salt River Reservation in Arizona – which is relatively small – reported more than 450 domestic violence cases in 2006 alone.

Those numbers are appalling.

Mr. President, native women should not be abandoned to a jurisdictional loophole. In effect, these women are living in a prosecution-free zone.  The tribal provisions in VAWA will provide a remedy. The bill allows tribal courts to prosecute non-Indians in a narrow set of cases that meet the following specific conditions:


The crime must have occurred in Indian country;

The crime must be either a domestic violence or dating violence offense, or a violation of a protection order; and

The non-Indian defendant must reside in Indian country, be employed in Indian country, or be the spouse or intimate partner of a member of the prosecuting tribe.

This bill does not extend tribal jurisdiction to general crimes of violence by non-Indians. It does not apply to crimes between two non-Indians, or crimes between persons with no ties to the tribe. If they don't have any ties to the tribe it doesn't apply. Nothing in this provision diminishes or alters the jurisdiction of any federal or state court.

I know some of my colleagues question if a tribal court can provide the same protections to defendants that are guaranteed in a federal or state court. The bill addresses this concern. It provides comprehensive protections to all criminal defendants who are prosecuted in tribal courts, whether or not the defendant is a Native American. Defendants would essentially have the same rights in tribal court as in state court.

These include, among many others, the rights to counsel, to a speedy trial, and to due process. The rights against unreasonable search and seizures, double jeopardy, and self-incrimination. A tribe that does not provide these protections cannot prosecute non-Indians under this provision.

Mr. President, some have also questioned whether Congress has the authority to expand tribal criminal jurisdiction to cover non-Indians.  This issue was carefully considered in drafting the tribal jurisdiction provision. The Indian Affairs and Judiciary Committees worked closely with the Department of Justice to ensure that the legislation is constitutional. 

As a former federal prosecutor and Attorney General of a state with a large Native American population, I know how difficult the legal maze can be for Tribal Communities. And one result of this maze is unchecked crime. In situations where personnel and funding run thin, and distances are long, violence often goes unpunished. 

This legislation will create a local solution for a local problem. Tribes have proven their effectiveness in combating domestic violence committed by Native Americans. But let me reiterate this very important point – without an act of Congress, tribes cannot prosecute a non-Indian -- even if he lives on the reservation, even if he is married to a tribal member -- ithout this act of Congress, tribes will continue to lack authority.

This bill will also promote other important efforts to protect Native women from an epidemic of domestic violence. With increasing grants for tribal programs to address violence, with support for research on violence against Native women, and also by allowing federal prosecutors to seek tougher sentences for perpetrators who strangle or suffocate their spouses or partners.

All of these provisions are about justice. Right now, Native women don't get the justice they deserve. But these are strong women. They, rightly, demand to be heard. They have identified a desperate need and logical solutions. That is why Native women and tribal leaders across the nation support the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act and the proposed tribal provisions.

There are many-far too many-stories of violence against Native women and of the failure to protect them. Stories that should outrage us all and that could end through local intervention. Local authority that will only be made possible through an act of Congress. We have the opportunity to support such an act in the tribal provisions of VAWA. With this bill we can close a dark and desperate loophole in criminal jurisdiction.
 
Native women have waited too long already for justice. They should not have to wait any longer.

Content on the Beat

WARNING: All articles and photos with a byline or photo credit are copyrighted to the author or photographer. You may not use any information found within the articles without asking permission AND giving attribution to the source. Photos can be requested and may incur a nominal fee for use personally or commercially.

Disclaimer: If you find errors in articles not written by the Beat team but sent to us from other content providers, please contact the writer, not the Beat. For example, obituaries are always provided by the funeral home or a family member. We can fix errors, but please give details on where the error is so we can find it. News releases from government and non-profit entities are posted generally without change, except for legal notices, which incur a small charge.

NOTE: If an article does not have a byline, it was written by someone not affiliated with the Beat and then sent to the Beat for posting.

Images: We have received complaints about large images blocking parts of other articles. If you encounter this problem, click on the title of the article you want to read and it will take you to that article's page, which shows only that article without any intruders. 

New Columnists: The Beat continues to bring you new columnists. And check out the old faithfuls who continue to provide content.

Newsletter: If you opt in to the Join GCB Three Times Weekly Updates option above this to the right, you will be subscribed to email notifications with links to recently posted articles.

Submitting to the Beat

Those new to providing news releases to the Beat are asked to please check out submission guidelines at https://www.grantcountybeat.com/about/submissions. They are for your information to make life easier on the readers, as well as for the editor.

Advertising: Don't forget to tell advertisers that you saw their ads on the Beat.

Classifieds: We have changed Classifieds to a simpler option. Check periodically to see if any new ones have popped up. Send your information to editor@grantcountybeat.com and we will post it as soon as we can. Instructions and prices are on the page.

Editor's Notes

It has come to this editor's attention that people are sending information to the Grant County Beat Facebook page. Please be aware that the editor does not regularly monitor the page. If you have items you want to send to the editor, please send them to editor@grantcountybeat.com. Thanks!

Here for YOU: Consider the Beat your DAILY newspaper for up-to-date information about Grant County. It's at your fingertips! One Click to Local News. Thanks for your support for and your readership of Grant County's online news source—www.grantcountybeat.com

Feel free to notify editor@grantcountybeat.com if you notice any technical problems on the site. Your convenience is my desire for the Beat.  The Beat totally appreciates its readers and subscribers!  

Compliance: Because you are an esteemed member of The Grant County Beat readership, be assured that we at the Beat continue to do everything we can to be in full compliance with GDPR and pertinent US law, so that the information you have chosen to give to us cannot be compromised.