Udall-sponsored bill would provide certainty to water users

WASHINGTON – Yesterday, U.S. Senator Tom Udall (D-N.M.), vice chairman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, joined Committee Chairman John Hoeven (R-N.D.) in leading a business meeting to consider two bills, including the Udall-sponsored Indian Water Rights Settlement Extension Act.  Both bills passed the committee by voice vote.

“Indian water rights settlements are simply good policy,” said Udall.  “They allow communities to avoid time-consuming, expensive, and divisive litigation and provide certainty by resolving long-standing claims.  My bill, S. 886, will secure a predictable, reliable funding source for future Indian water rights settlements so stakeholders can better plan for the future.”

At the business meeting, Udall introduced an amendment that makes several important revisions to S. 886.  Specifically, it limits the duration of the Settlement Fund extension to an additional 10 years, maintains the existing priority list for the initial 10 years, establishes a $90 million dollar cap on the amount of annual allocations any individual settlement can receive during the additional 10 years, and allows the Aamodt Litigation Settlement and Arizona Tribes to utilize unused portions of the existing priority list.

The following Tribes, stakeholder associations, and water districts have expressed their support for S. 886:

Tribes

  • Navajo Nation
  • Hualapai Tribe
  • Tohono O’odham
  • Ute Tribe
  • Fort Belknap Indian Community
  • The Confederation of Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Nation (CSKT)
  • Yavapai-Apache Nation

Associations

  • Western States Water Council
  • Native American Rights Fund
  • National Congress of American Indians
  • All Pueblo Council of Governors
  • Family Farm Alliance
  • Association of California Water Agencies
  • California Association of Sanitation Agencies
  • Inter Tribal Association of Arizona

Water Districts

  • Salt River Project
  • Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
  • Truckee-Carson Irrigation District

Below is the full text of Udall’s opening statement.

Mr. Chairman, thank you for scheduling today’s business meeting.  I support the bills on the agenda and urge my colleagues to vote to advance both measures. 

My bill, S. 886, will secure a predictable, reliable funding source for future Indian water rights settlements.  For those under negotiation. For those that are near enactment, but have not identified a funding source.  

Indian water rights settlements are simply good policy.  They allow communities to avoid time consuming, expensive, and divisive litigation.  And provide certainty by resolving long-standing claims so stakeholders can better plan for the future.

Take the Navajo-Utah settlement, which is currently subject to Congressional approval.  More than 40 percent of Navajo households in Utah lack running water or adequate sanitation in their homes.  Many in this community are forced to haul water, from a single spigot, miles from any residence.  This is simply unacceptable.   

Specifically, S. 886 will alleviate pressure on the Bureau of Reclamation’s discretionary budget by ensuring that settlements like Navajo-Utah are eligible for the Reclamation Water Settlement Fund.

New Mexicans and western water users know that, every year, more and more of Reclamation’s budget is dedicated to Indian water rights settlements resulting in less funding for other priorities.  

That is why the Western States Water Council, Family Farm Alliance, Association of California Water Agencies, Salt River Project, and Metropolitan Water District all support my bill.  

Speaking of western water users, Congress recently authorized the Drought Contingency Plan.

Many of you around this dais recognized this was a critical step Congress needed to take to protect the economy, environment, and health of the Southwest.

But the DCP would not have not been possible without the help of Indian tribes, and their willingness to voluntarily reduce the use of their water rights.   

DCP is proof that when a crisis arises, we have the capacity to come together to find solution.  By “we”, I am talking about Indian and non-Indian water users.  I am also talking about Congress.  When it comes to western drought, “we” are in this together.

Turning back to S. 886, I want to thank Chairman Hoeven and my Committee colleagues, Senators McSally, Moran, Tester, Cortez Masto, and Daines, for working with me to improve the bill.  We worked hard to find the right balance.  Some wanted more in the bill.  Some less.  But that is the nature of compromise.

My substitute amendment makes several important revisions to S. 886.  It limits the duration of the Settlement Fund extension to an additional 10 years.  It establishes a $90 million dollar cap on the amount of annual allocations any individual settlement can receive during those 10 years.  And it will allow Arizona Tribes to utilize unused portions of the Arizona priority.

The bill will also allow the Aamodt Litigation Settlement to have sufficient resources to reach completion.  And it will bring the Kickapoo Tribe of Kansas a step closer to authorizing its settlement agreement. 

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.  I urge swift approval of S. 886 as amended and S. 2071.

Content on the Beat

WARNING: All articles and photos with a byline or photo credit are copyrighted to the author or photographer. You may not use any information found within the articles without asking permission AND giving attribution to the source. Photos can be requested and may incur a nominal fee for use personally or commercially.

Disclaimer: If you find errors in articles not written by the Beat team but sent to us from other content providers, please contact the writer, not the Beat. For example, obituaries are always provided by the funeral home or a family member. We can fix errors, but please give details on where the error is so we can find it. News releases from government and non-profit entities are posted generally without change, except for legal notices, which incur a small charge.

NOTE: If an article does not have a byline, it was written by someone not affiliated with the Beat and then sent to the Beat for posting.

Images: We have received complaints about large images blocking parts of other articles. If you encounter this problem, click on the title of the article you want to read and it will take you to that article's page, which shows only that article without any intruders. 

New Columnists: The Beat continues to bring you new columnists. And check out the old faithfuls who continue to provide content.

Newsletter: If you opt in to the Join GCB Three Times Weekly Updates option above this to the right, you will be subscribed to email notifications with links to recently posted articles.

Submitting to the Beat

Those new to providing news releases to the Beat are asked to please check out submission guidelines at https://www.grantcountybeat.com/about/submissions. They are for your information to make life easier on the readers, as well as for the editor.

Advertising: Don't forget to tell advertisers that you saw their ads on the Beat.

Classifieds: We have changed Classifieds to a simpler option. Check periodically to see if any new ones have popped up. Send your information to editor@grantcountybeat.com and we will post it as soon as we can. Instructions and prices are on the page.

Editor's Notes

It has come to this editor's attention that people are sending information to the Grant County Beat Facebook page. Please be aware that the editor does not regularly monitor the page. If you have items you want to send to the editor, please send them to editor@grantcountybeat.com. Thanks!

Here for YOU: Consider the Beat your DAILY newspaper for up-to-date information about Grant County. It's at your fingertips! One Click to Local News. Thanks for your support for and your readership of Grant County's online news source—www.grantcountybeat.com

Feel free to notify editor@grantcountybeat.com if you notice any technical problems on the site. Your convenience is my desire for the Beat.  The Beat totally appreciates its readers and subscribers!  

Compliance: Because you are an esteemed member of The Grant County Beat readership, be assured that we at the Beat continue to do everything we can to be in full compliance with GDPR and pertinent US law, so that the information you have chosen to give to us cannot be compromised.