‘Remain in Mexico’ program ends busing of migrants from Tucson, Ariz., to Texas; those with cases 300 miles away must arrange their own transport

By Michelle Hackman and Alicia A. Caldwell
Updated Jan. 2, 2020 5:33 pm ET

WASHINGTON—U.S. Customs and Border Protection for the first time Thursday began turning around migrants seeking asylum in Arizona and sending them to Nogales, Mexico, to await U.S. court hearings that they now will need to get to on their own.

The move expands the controversial Migrant Protection Protocols or “Remain in Mexico” program, which the U.S. adopted a year ago to deal with a surge of Central American migrants at the southern border.

Immigrant and human-rights advocates have criticized the policy for effectively requiring migrants to live in dangerous Mexican border cities, often for months, where the U.S. warns its own citizens to avoid traveling.

Border Patrol, a CBP agency that handles law enforcement between ports of entry, said it has returned to Nogales 18 migrants who crossed the border on Thursday. Their immigration court dates were set in El Paso, Texas, more than 300 miles away.

Since late November, more than 600 asylum seekers crossing the border near Tucson, Ariz., were transported by U.S. authorities on buses to El Paso, where they were then sent just across the border to Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, and assigned court dates often months in the future.

Now, the migrants returned to Nogales must arrange their own transportation to attend asylum hearings. On the Mexican side of the border, the journey from Nogales to Juárez takes significantly longer—about 371 miles, or nearly eight hours by car, according to Google Maps, about three hours longer than the drive takes on the U.S. side.

The change will require migrants to traverse one of the most dangerous regions of Mexico, along the border between the states of Sonora and Chihuahua, where rival gangs are engaged in a turf battle. Nine U.S. citizens, members of a Mormon family living in the area, were killed in an ambush on a Sonora highway in November, straining relations between Mexico and the U.S. Under State Department guidance, U.S. government employees aren’t permitted to travel through the area.

Two other border areas assign hearings to migrants at different ports of entry from where they are returned, but the distances are only about one-third that of the new Arizona requirement. Migrants crossing near Calexico, Calif., are returned to Mexicali, Mexico, and asked to appear in court in San Diego, an approximately 110-mile journey. Migrants crossing near Eagle Pass, Texas, are sent to Piedras Negras, Mexico, and required to appear at the tent court in Laredo, Texas, about the same distance away.

“This is a new level of logistical impossibility being put in front of people already facing just a litany of due-process violations preventing them from following through with their asylum claims,” said Ian Philabaum, an attorney with the Innovation Law Lab, which is suing the Trump administration over the legality of Remain in Mexico. A decision in the case from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is expected soon.

Roy Villareal, the Tucson sector chief for U.S. Border Patrol said the change would save the agency money since it ends busing to Texas and shortens an asylum seeker’s stay in custody. It would also free up his agents to return to the work of apprehending migrants.

“Operationally, the more agents I can get back into enforcement roles, the more impact that will have,” he said.

Asked whether the long journey through dangerous Mexican territory might deter some migrants from attending their immigration court hearings, Mr. Villareal said he expects to be criticized for any new policy change, regardless of the outcome, and added that deterring migrants was the intent.

“First and foremost, [the return to Nogales] should serve as a deterrent,” he said.

Until November, asylum seekers in Arizona were some of the last admitted into the U.S., rather than returned to Mexico. Most migrants seeking asylum arrive in the U.S. as families. A court settlement prohibits the government from detaining families for longer than 20 days.

As news spread that migrants crossing the Arizona border weren’t being sent back to Mexico, the Tucson border sector became the second-busiest crossing point in recent months, trailing only the Rio Grande Valley. In October and November 4,674 migrants crossed the border illegally near Tucson, more than double the number during the same two months the previous year. Border crossings plummeted in most other areas of the border over the same period.

The El Paso court already handles the largest Remain in Mexico docket, with more than 16,000 such cases filed there, of 56,000 across the country, according to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University, which tracks immigration court data.

The expansion of Remain in Mexico furthers the Trump administration’s goal of reducing access to the nation’s asylum system, which administration officials say immigrants have exploited to gain access to the U.S., where they can work while their cases make their way through the courts.

Asylum is a legal protection that anyone can seek if they are fleeing political, religious or other persecution in their home countries. Though crossing the border without permission is illegal, U.S. law allows foreigners to apply for asylum no matter how they entered the country.

“The Department is fully committed to the program and will continually work with the government of Mexico to expand and strengthen it,” acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf said in a statement. Mexico’s embassy in Washington didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Migrants returned to Mexico are never released into the U.S. They attend court hearings in CBP custody, and even migrants who have won asylum or another form of relief allowing them to remain in the U.S. have been routinely sent to Mexico pending a government appeal of their cases.

Thousands of people have been waiting months in Nogales for their asylum hearings. Immigrant advocates say the city’s few shelters have long been over capacity and many migrants have rented hotels or rooms in private houses.

Joanna Williams, director of education and advocacy for the Kino Border Initiative, a binational immigrant aid group in Nogales, said she is concerned about how quickly the new policy was launched. She said Mexican officials have advised that as many as 30 people could be returned daily, a figure that could quickly overwhelm the limited resources for assistance.

“We’re concerned that already vulnerable people will be homeless,” Ms. Williams said.

Corrections & Amplifications

More than 600 asylum seekers crossing the border near Tucson, Ariz., were transported El Paso, Texas, since late November. An earlier version of this article incorrectly said more than 1,600 asylum seekers were transported. A photo caption earlier misidentified a Border Patrol vehicle as belonging to Customs and Border Protection. (Jan. 2, 2020)

Write to Michelle Hackman at Michelle.Hackman@wsj.com and Alicia A. Caldwell at Alicia.Caldwell@wsj.com

Copyright ©2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

WSJ opens select articles to reader conversation to promote thoughtful dialogue. 

Content on the Beat

WARNING: All articles and photos with a byline or photo credit are copyrighted to the author or photographer. You may not use any information found within the articles without asking permission AND giving attribution to the source. Photos can be requested and may incur a nominal fee for use personally or commercially.

Disclaimer: If you find errors in articles not written by the Beat team but sent to us from other content providers, please contact the writer, not the Beat. For example, obituaries are always provided by the funeral home or a family member. We can fix errors, but please give details on where the error is so we can find it. News releases from government and non-profit entities are posted generally without change, except for legal notices, which incur a small charge.

NOTE: If an article does not have a byline, it was written by someone not affiliated with the Beat and then sent to the Beat for posting.

Images: We have received complaints about large images blocking parts of other articles. If you encounter this problem, click on the title of the article you want to read and it will take you to that article's page, which shows only that article without any intruders. 

New Columnists: The Beat continues to bring you new columnists. And check out the old faithfuls who continue to provide content.

Newsletter: If you opt in to the Join GCB Three Times Weekly Updates option above this to the right, you will be subscribed to email notifications with links to recently posted articles.

Submitting to the Beat

Those new to providing news releases to the Beat are asked to please check out submission guidelines at https://www.grantcountybeat.com/about/submissions. They are for your information to make life easier on the readers, as well as for the editor.

Advertising: Don't forget to tell advertisers that you saw their ads on the Beat.

Classifieds: We have changed Classifieds to a simpler option. Check periodically to see if any new ones have popped up. Send your information to editor@grantcountybeat.com and we will post it as soon as we can. Instructions and prices are on the page.

Editor's Notes

It has come to this editor's attention that people are sending information to the Grant County Beat Facebook page. Please be aware that the editor does not regularly monitor the page. If you have items you want to send to the editor, please send them to editor@grantcountybeat.com. Thanks!

Here for YOU: Consider the Beat your DAILY newspaper for up-to-date information about Grant County. It's at your fingertips! One Click to Local News. Thanks for your support for and your readership of Grant County's online news source—www.grantcountybeat.com

Feel free to notify editor@grantcountybeat.com if you notice any technical problems on the site. Your convenience is my desire for the Beat.  The Beat totally appreciates its readers and subscribers!  

Compliance: Because you are an esteemed member of The Grant County Beat readership, be assured that we at the Beat continue to do everything we can to be in full compliance with GDPR and pertinent US law, so that the information you have chosen to give to us cannot be compromised.