A little over a year ago I bought a new truck. It's a really nice truck with lots of safety features that I like and a couple that I don't. One of the features will give me a warning if I stray out of my lane. The steering wheel will shake slightly. It's not a bad thing because sometimes you look down or maybe you lose attention and the feature can help you avoid an accident. Recently though, a warning message appeared on the instrument panel. The message said I appeared to be tired and should pull over. There was also a 'picture' of a cup of coffee.

I am still not sure exactly what I did while operating my vehicle that triggered the warning. I may have begun to sway out of the lane but that warning indicator was not activated or maybe I had slowed down then sped up. I'm just not sure. But I read an article recently that causes me great concern about this feature and how it will be used. You should be greatly concerned as well, unless you are a member of the Progressive Brown Shirts that like to control everyone's behavior and report us to authorities when we don't comply with your expectations.Former US Representative Bob Barr has been picking through the infrastructure bill trying to make people aware of how much pork, unrelated regulations, and government overreach is in the bill. One particular provision will require all automobile manufacturers to install a kill switch in every new vehicle they make. On the surface, as with many of these mandates, it might sound like a good idea. Police would have the ability to activate the kill switch causing a vehicle to stop if the officers are in pursuit and the vehicle driver refuses to stop. Especially if it is a high speed pursuit end innocent lives are being threatened. Who doesn't want to protect innocent people from being plowed by a drunk driver or criminal trying to avoid capture?

However, if you dig a little deeper you'll see a provision That will allow government authorities to monitor a person's driving in real time. If an algorithm determines the person is driving erratically or could be impaired, the kill switch would be activated and the car would be disabled. How does that even work? As I said, the monitoring system in my new pickup truck determined that I was possibly sleepy and driving in an unsafe manner. I still don't know what I did and certainly have no way to appeal my truck's decision.

Would this be a situation that if you violated the standard of safe driving twice within a certain time frame your vehicle would be shut off or is there a standard of how badly you are driving? Is there a difference between being tired and being impaired due to alcohol or drugs? Does the vehicle shut off immediately leaving you stopped in the middle of the roadway? Seems like that would create a significant hazard in and of itself.

Can you imagine if the artificial intelligence determines that you are impaired because you're driving above the speed limit and changing lanes quite a bit, in what the computer determines to be an unsafe manner, but you are doing so because you're on the way to the hospital with someone that needs immediate medical attention? I'm sure you can imagine several other scenarios, such as reaching in the backseat to slap some sense into your kids, in which you are certainly capable of operating the vehicle safely but the computer algorithms disagree.

This is also a matter of guilty until you can prove you are innocent, which would be an almost impossible task. I'm sure the police would send you a traffic ticket which would be impossible to refute because the "data" provided by the computer would likely be considered by a judge to be definitive proof of your impairment.

This is just another reason why we need governmental reform. This provision has nothing to do with infrastructure. According to Bob Barr, 90% of the spending and provisions of the infrastructure bill have nothing to do with roads, bridges, water systems, or anything else that you and I might consider infrastructure. Not only do we need term limits and to put a limit on how many days Congress can meet in a year, but we also need to have a requirement that anything in a bill must be specifically related to the intention of the bill. If it's an infrastructure bill then it must be infrastructure and cannot contain any amendments or provisions that are not specifically and clearly infrastructure programs. The same with any other bill.

I am still of the belief that if enough people spent five minutes a day to send an email to our representatives and senators, we could influence them. Maybe I'm wrong but I'd certainly like to see the effort made and be proven wrong.

Content on the Beat

WARNING: All articles and photos with a byline or photo credit are copyrighted to the author or photographer. You may not use any information found within the articles without asking permission AND giving attribution to the source. Photos can be requested and may incur a nominal fee for use personally or commercially.

Disclaimer: If you find errors in articles not written by the Beat team but sent to us from other content providers, please contact the writer, not the Beat. For example, obituaries are always provided by the funeral home or a family member. We can fix errors, but please give details on where the error is so we can find it. News releases from government and non-profit entities are posted generally without change, except for legal notices, which incur a small charge.

NOTE: If an article does not have a byline, it was written by someone not affiliated with the Beat and then sent to the Beat for posting.

Images: We have received complaints about large images blocking parts of other articles. If you encounter this problem, click on the title of the article you want to read and it will take you to that article's page, which shows only that article without any intruders. 

New Columnists: The Beat continues to bring you new columnists. And check out the old faithfuls who continue to provide content.

Newsletter: If you opt in to the Join GCB Three Times Weekly Updates option above this to the right, you will be subscribed to email notifications with links to recently posted articles.

Submitting to the Beat

Those new to providing news releases to the Beat are asked to please check out submission guidelines at https://www.grantcountybeat.com/about/submissions. They are for your information to make life easier on the readers, as well as for the editor.

Advertising: Don't forget to tell advertisers that you saw their ads on the Beat.

Classifieds: We have changed Classifieds to a cheaper and shorter option. Check periodically to see if any new ones have popped up. The former software failed us, so it's just a category now, with prices posted. Send your information to editor@grantcountybeat.com and we will post it as soon as we can. Instructions and prices are on the page.

Editor's Notes

It has come to this editor's attention that people are sending information to the Grant County Beat Facebook page. Please be aware that the editor does not regularly monitor the page. If you have items you want to send to the editor, please send them to editor@grantcountybeat.com. Thanks!

Here for YOU: Consider the Beat your DAILY newspaper for up-to-date information about Grant County. It's at your fingertips! One Click to Local News. Thanks for your support for and your readership of Grant County's online news source—www.grantcountybeat.com

Feel free to notify editor@grantcountybeat.com if you notice any technical problems on the site. Your convenience is my desire for the Beat.  The Beat totally appreciates its readers and subscribers!  

Compliance: Because you are an esteemed member of The Grant County Beat readership, be assured that we at the Beat continue to do everything we can to be in full compliance with GDPR and pertinent US law, so that the information you have chosen to give to us cannot be compromised.