By Mary Alice Murphy

A letter from Timothy R. Petty, Ph.D., assistant Secretary for Water and Science, sent on Dec. 20, 2019 to New Mexico Central Arizona Project Entity Executive Director Anthony Gutierrez replied to letters sent by the entity to the U.S. Department of the Interior Office of the Secretary. The first letter was dated Aug. 20, 2019 and the others sent Sept. 17 and Oct. 30, 2019. They, as well as information provided in the Oct. 24 meeting in Washington, D.C. requested the extension of the funding deadline described in the Arizona Water Settlements Act of 2004. That deadline is Dec. 31, 2019.

The letter to Gutierrez states that the Department of the Interior is committed to supporting the management and development of water supplies critical to communities, farms and the environment.

A quote from Section 212(j) from the AWSA established the standard for any extension, which comes down to "for reasons outside the control of the State of New Mexico, the Secretary may extend the deadline, … not to extend beyond Dec 31, 2030."

Petty said in the letter that New Mexico has had 15 years to identify a feasible project and obtain a Record of Decision to meet the deadline for the additional funding as defined in the Act. The funding would be released by the Lower Colorado River Basin Fund for construction of a project.

"After careful consideration, I regret to inform you that due to the State's failure to make progress, an extension of the deadline… will not be granted," the letter states.

"It's a disappointment this project that would bring critical water supplies to rural communities in New Mexico has faced such scrutiny and a lack of support from the State of New Mexico," Petty wrote. "Water supply infrastructure is a priority of this Administration, and the Department of Interior is committed to helping deliver reliable water supplies to rural communities. The State's lack of action undermines the importance of the water supplies provided by the NM Unit in ensuring that rural communities in southwestern New Mexico have the water security necessary to thrive and grow."

Gutierrez talked to the Beat. "It was clearly the responsibility of the state to develop the water, but we got nothing but opposition from legislators and at least three governors during the time this project has been discussed. It was all about politics. It's sad."

He said the tragedy is the New Mexico will lose more than $50 million in federal funding.

"We did years of so-called consensus building to no avail," Gutierrez said. "Instead of groups and individuals being on opposite sides of the issue, we should have worked together. The project continued to be changed because of the insecurity of not knowing what legislators would try to pull on us each session. Part of the blame is due to our then-Senator and now-Lt. Governor, who never really supported the efforts of his constituents in southwestern New Mexico to develop the water."

Gutierrez noted the Interstate Stream Commission helped in development of a project, but "it came down to special interests opposing everything that was discussed. What's sad is that a handful of special interest groups, which have huge lobbying powers with the Legislature and the congressional delegation, opposed us at every turn."

He said someday, "maybe not in our lifetimes," a demand for the water will arise, and because of the opposing groups, who always said the taxpayers would be on the hook to pay for the water, "well, now when that demand comes, it will be the taxpayers paying for that water. With the federal funding, the taxpayers would not have been directly paying for it, but now taxpayers will pay. They will likely have to pay corporations that will be selling us the water. That's the effect of what the opposition achieved."

Gutierrez said the opposing groups do not get funding unless they create controversy, so they continue to create controversy to rile up their donors. They create lawsuits and then benefit from the settling of those suits.

"In the environmental impact statement, which has yet to be completed, our discussions were based less on impact on the system and more on the benefits to the river," he continued. "They (the opposition) were fighting that, but really it was about the dollar."

Gutierrez said a lot of benefit derived from the members of the ISC visiting the areas where diversions are proposed. "The Virden project can be funding using New Mexico Unit Fund money. The engineer's estimate was $5 million to $7 million, but we think it can be done with less money."

"This decision on the construction funding does not take away the ability to develop the water," Gutierrez continued. "It takes away the money, which is a great loss to the area and the state. We will not get the gross receipts taxes that would have derived from the construction. We don't get the jobs and the sales from the construction. We didn't just lose the more than $50 million, we lost everything to go with it, including jobs."

Projects can be funded through other sources, "it just takes longer. This money that we lost was Arizona water users paying for it. Now, it's just water under the bridge continuing to go to Arizona."

Copies of the letter went to New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, as well as to the members of the congressional delegation, Sen. Tom Udall, Sen. Martin Heinrich and Rep. Xochitl Torres Small.

 

 

Content on the Beat

WARNING: All articles and photos with a byline or photo credit are copyrighted to the author or photographer. You may not use any information found within the articles without asking permission AND giving attribution to the source. Photos can be requested and may incur a nominal fee for use personally or commercially.

Disclaimer: If you find errors in articles not written by the Beat team but sent to us from other content providers, please contact the writer, not the Beat. For example, obituaries are always provided by the funeral home or a family member. We can fix errors, but please give details on where the error is so we can find it. News releases from government and non-profit entities are posted generally without change, except for legal notices, which incur a small charge.

NOTE: If an article does not have a byline, it was written by someone not affiliated with the Beat and then sent to the Beat for posting.

Images: We have received complaints about large images blocking parts of other articles. If you encounter this problem, click on the title of the article you want to read and it will take you to that article's page, which shows only that article without any intruders. 

New Columnists: The Beat continues to bring you new columnists. And check out the old faithfuls who continue to provide content.

Newsletter: If you opt in to the Join GCB Three Times Weekly Updates option above this to the right, you will be subscribed to email notifications with links to recently posted articles.

Submitting to the Beat

Those new to providing news releases to the Beat are asked to please check out submission guidelines at https://www.grantcountybeat.com/about/submissions. They are for your information to make life easier on the readers, as well as for the editor.

Advertising: Don't forget to tell advertisers that you saw their ads on the Beat.

Classifieds: We have changed Classifieds to a simpler option. Check periodically to see if any new ones have popped up. Send your information to editor@grantcountybeat.com and we will post it as soon as we can. Instructions and prices are on the page.

Editor's Notes

It has come to this editor's attention that people are sending information to the Grant County Beat Facebook page. Please be aware that the editor does not regularly monitor the page. If you have items you want to send to the editor, please send them to editor@grantcountybeat.com. Thanks!

Here for YOU: Consider the Beat your DAILY newspaper for up-to-date information about Grant County. It's at your fingertips! One Click to Local News. Thanks for your support for and your readership of Grant County's online news source—www.grantcountybeat.com

Feel free to notify editor@grantcountybeat.com if you notice any technical problems on the site. Your convenience is my desire for the Beat.  The Beat totally appreciates its readers and subscribers!  

Compliance: Because you are an esteemed member of The Grant County Beat readership, be assured that we at the Beat continue to do everything we can to be in full compliance with GDPR and pertinent US law, so that the information you have chosen to give to us cannot be compromised.