By Simon Wheaton-Smith

Stories go around the internet which are expanded and repeated. These stories usually have the seeds of truth. I am neither a doctor nor lawyer, and I can be wrong about my take on such stories, but here is my personal analysis of one of them.

The quote I received was "The CDC website disclosed the shockingly small number of people who died from only the Wuhan coronavirus, with no other cause of death mentioned. Hold on to your hat because here it is: out of the 161,392 deaths in the CDC data, just 6%, about 9,700 deaths, were attributed to the coronavirus alone. According to the CDC, the other 94 percent had an average of 2.6 additional conditions or causes of deaths, such as heart disease, diabetes, and sepsis."

I found the 6% number on the CDC web site under a sub heading Comorbidities.

A long term friend of mine, Dr Pugh MD who specialized in tropical diseases, agreed with the quote "This does not mean that someone who has hypertension or diabetes who died of COVID didn't die of COVID-19. They did"

If that all works for you, then read no more. Otherwise I shall dig deeper.

The death certificate Part 1 allows 4 entries, the first is the cause, the next three are "due to or as a consequence of". The CDC statement simply says about 6% listed COVID-19 as the only entry in the death certificate in Part 1. So the other 94% referred to COVID-19 as a cause of death and had additional factors. That means COVID-19 was the ultimate cause of death but that other things were going on.

A question to ask might be "is there any incentive for a doctor to place COVID-19 on the death certificate when they did not believe COVID-19 was the real cause?" The internet story does not even suggest doctors can't fill in death certificates properly, nor does it suggest doctors benefit in any way from saying COVID was the ultimate cause when it wasn't.

At this point I had serious doubts about the meaning of the internet story, but I did accept the 6% figure. I continued on, if one assumes death certification errors were mistakes and not intentional then how many errors were made?

Tracking deaths seems to use a couple of methods, and those methods do not always exactly agree. It appears some deaths recorded as COVID-19 may be questionable; the worst example I found was an over reporting of 9% in one state, however, more common was about a 0.5% error. Some states used the two common methods and then resolved those differing numbers. Even if one assumed that every state in the union had a 9% reporting error, then with 184,083 CDC reported deaths (as of 9/2/20), it would still leave a final count of 167,515 deaths and that is still a very large number. It suggests the internet data, while correct, may have been misinterpreted.

Next I looked at the CDC guidance on death certificates, as well as the international standards which the CDC follows. One concern I had was clarified by "It is important to write the cause of death (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) rather than the mechanism of death (e.g. respiratory failure). That explained why Part 1 of the death certificate said what it did and it was more helpful in tracking why deaths were occurring.

I suggest other ailments that developed after infection, would clearly not invalidate a death due to COVID-19.

But wait, there's more. What if the patient had pre-existing conditions? Part 2 of the death certificate may include those as "other significant conditions contributing to death but not resulting in the underlying causes given in Part 1". Part 2 simply means contributing to but not resulting in the Part 1 causes. Do we trust doctors to get this one right? If not, change your doctor.

As an aside, there are other ways of analyzing overall death counts, one such is "excess deaths" which is defined as "the difference between the observed numbers of deaths in specific time periods and expected numbers of deaths in the same time periods. …. Weekly counts of deaths are compared with historical trends to determine whether the number of deaths is significantly higher than expected." Using the CDC excess death dashboard to show all deaths, actual and excess, it shows that in the entire country just for the one week ending April 4, 2020, there were over 15,000 excess deaths. This more academic method again would not easily support a claim of only 9,700 deaths total due to COVID-19 for the entire pandemic; even though it is a more abstract approach and not COVID-19 specific

Conclusion: This internet story quotes the CDC correctly, however it needs a closer look at how death causes are indicated, collateral medical issues, how pre existing factor do or do not come into play, and finally a big picture view of excess deaths. CDC guidance says simply that if COVID-19 is the cause, say so. Doctors are trusted persons, they have no incentive to state COVID-19 when it is not. I find the internet story to be true as to the 6% data, but that the interpretation of the internet story is questionable.

My opinions are personal, and I can be wrong; what is important is that we question what we read or hear, and then and only then coalesce our thoughts before passing them on to others.

My references below are a mix of government sources (some trust them, some do not) as well as news outlets (some trust them, some do not). Many other sources exist.

Reference:

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm (has the 6% figure)

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/blue_form.pdf

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/misc/hb_cod.pdf

https://crvsgateway.info/The-International-Form-of-Medical-Certificate-of-Cause-of-Death~356

https://www.mypcnow.org/fast-fact/completing-a-death-certificate/

https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/Guidelines_Cause_of_Death_COVID-19.pdf?ua=1

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf

https://covidtracking.com/blog/confirmed-and-probable-covid-19-deaths-counted-two-ways

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/coding-and-reporting.htm

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm#dashboard

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fauci-shoots-down-false-claim-143100424.html

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/covid-19-mortality-data-files.htm

https://www.mlive.com/public-interest/2020/09/no-cdc-did-not-reduce-the-coronavirus-death-count-despite-what-you-may-have-heard.html

Content on the Beat

WARNING: All articles and photos with a byline or photo credit are copyrighted to the author or photographer. You may not use any information found within the articles without asking permission AND giving attribution to the source. Photos can be requested and may incur a nominal fee for use personally or commercially.

Disclaimer: If you find errors in articles not written by the Beat team but sent to us from other content providers, please contact the writer, not the Beat. For example, obituaries are always provided by the funeral home or a family member. We can fix errors, but please give details on where the error is so we can find it. News releases from government and non-profit entities are posted generally without change, except for legal notices, which incur a small charge.

NOTE: If an article does not have a byline, it was written by someone not affiliated with the Beat and then sent to the Beat for posting.

Images: We have received complaints about large images blocking parts of other articles. If you encounter this problem, click on the title of the article you want to read and it will take you to that article's page, which shows only that article without any intruders. 

New Columnists: The Beat continues to bring you new columnists. And check out the old faithfuls who continue to provide content.

Newsletter: If you opt in to the Join GCB Three Times Weekly Updates option above this to the right, you will be subscribed to email notifications with links to recently posted articles.

Submitting to the Beat

Those new to providing news releases to the Beat are asked to please check out submission guidelines at https://www.grantcountybeat.com/about/submissions. They are for your information to make life easier on the readers, as well as for the editor.

Advertising: Don't forget to tell advertisers that you saw their ads on the Beat.

Classifieds: We have changed Classifieds to a simpler option. Check periodically to see if any new ones have popped up. Send your information to editor@grantcountybeat.com and we will post it as soon as we can. Instructions and prices are on the page.

Editor's Notes

It has come to this editor's attention that people are sending information to the Grant County Beat Facebook page. Please be aware that the editor does not regularly monitor the page. If you have items you want to send to the editor, please send them to editor@grantcountybeat.com. Thanks!

Here for YOU: Consider the Beat your DAILY newspaper for up-to-date information about Grant County. It's at your fingertips! One Click to Local News. Thanks for your support for and your readership of Grant County's online news source—www.grantcountybeat.com

Feel free to notify editor@grantcountybeat.com if you notice any technical problems on the site. Your convenience is my desire for the Beat.  The Beat totally appreciates its readers and subscribers!  

Compliance: Because you are an esteemed member of The Grant County Beat readership, be assured that we at the Beat continue to do everything we can to be in full compliance with GDPR and pertinent US law, so that the information you have chosen to give to us cannot be compromised.