By Peter Burrows  elburropete.com

This was posted in 2014, but it's still relevant, which is a damn shame.

(Monsters From the Id 2/25/14 (Note to readers: This was written when we first began negotiating with the Iranians to prevent, or at least delay, their development of nuclear weapons. As this pamphlet is being printed in 2022, a new round of nuclear negotiations is underway and Iran is still ruled by Shias. Unfortunately, our leaders are still unaware of the inherent threat nuclear-armed Mahdis pose.)

I read recently that scientists in England are having success improving some peoples' mathematical abilities by using mild electrical stimulation to their brains. This reminded me of a classic sci-fi film from 1956, "Forbidden Planet."

The plot, in brief, has a space ship landing on a planet inhabited by only two people who arrived there sometime in the past, a mad scientist and his really ugly daughter. (Sure.) He tells the new arrivals that the planet was once occupied by an advanced species that totally and mysteriously disappeared.

Still intact is a vast system of power generation and a device that, when strapped to the head, either measures intelligence or, at the flip of a switch, gives the brain an intelligence boosting electrical shock. The mad scientist had given himself the shock treatment and had barely survived, though with a newly enhanced intelligence far higher than he had prior to the shock, and far higher than any of the newcomers.

Since mini-skirts were the rage throughout the galaxy, you don't need to press a AA battery to your forehead to know that the inevitable soon begins to happen between daughter and Captain astronaut. This, Papa doesn't like, but even he doesn't know how much he doesn't like it.

As the romance blossoms, the astronauts come under ever more ferocious attacks by invisible beings. Just when the end looks near, one of the astronauts puts on the headset, gives himself an intelligence shock, and, sure enough, it does him in. Before dying, he whispers that the jolt gave him the insight on their dilemma, namely, that they were being attacked by "monsters from the Id."

Back in those days, Freudian psychology had captured the public imagination, so many in the audience were probably familiar with the mad scientist's explanation when asked what the Id was: "It's an obsolete term once used to describe the elementary basis of the subconscious mind."

Think of the Id as the source of the survival instinct, the kill-or-be-killed reaction, the unreasoning source of hate, lust, and fear. This, of course, is immediately understood by our hero-lover-astronaut, who sees the source of all their troubles in the subconscious of the mad scientist father, who fears losing his daughter. Of more importance, the father has the intelligence to command the vast power of the forbidden planet through telekinetic abilities he doesn't know he has, can't control, and which will lead to their total destruction.

I won't bother you with the ending, other than to say it is an apt metaphor for our times. The technology to destroy ourselves, as happened to the original inhabitants of the Forbidden Planet, is spreading rapidly, and we remain little more than intelligent apes, prone to primitive, tribal emotions that may not have been so dangerous in the past, though disastrous enough.

Who would deny that Hitler was a monster from the Id? Furthermore, he Pied- Pipered the whole nation to follow him. Up until they started losing the war, the German people adored Adolph Hitler, the Id monster. Just look at the young ladies in the crowds from 1930's documentaries. Elvis never had such "love."

Furthermore, and this is the really scary part, a disinterested Martian paying us a visit in 1910, if asked to pick the most advanced, civilized, prosperous society on earth, would probably have picked Germany. Fast forward 25-30 years: Behold! German monsters from the Id run rampant. What if Hitler had possessed nuclear weapons?

There are three facts of life I wish were not true, but are:
1) Monsters from the Id will always be with us.
2) The spread of WMD means we cannot afford the luxury of a Neville "Peace in our time" Chamberlain.
3) Neville Chamberlains will always be with us.

In a MAD age, an age of mutually assured destruction, there is hope that the monsters from the Id will be held in check by angels from the superego and reason from the ego -- to exhaust my Freud ---but, and this is very relevant, what if a nuclear armed monster from the Id is suicidal?

I am thinking of the Muslim sect known as Mahdaviats, Shia Muslims who believe the world will be saved by the Twelfth Imam, also known as the Mahdi, who disappeared in the ninth century and will return to save a world descended into chaos and destruction. Shia Muslims rule Iran and Iran is developing nuclear weapons.

President Obama once said we needn't worry about Musims using nuclear weapons because that would be "against their religion." He couldn't have been more mistaken. In fact, some Mahdaviats believe it is their religious duty to hasten the Imam's return by creating the chaos required. In such a world, MAD is not a deterrent but an encouragement. Monsters from the Id, indeed.

Iranian President Mahmoud Amadinejad ordered the widening of a boulevard in Tehran to accommodate the triumphal return of the Twelfth Imam. Why would he do such a thing? He is no longer president, but the new Iranian President, Hasan Rouhani, in a speech last May, said: "Saying 'Death to America' is easy. We need to express 'Death to America' with action."

The Iranians say they are not trying to build nuclear weapons, and even if true for now, their long-range intentions are very suspect. They've been waiting for the Mahdi for over 11 centuries. A few more years, or decades, to gather the means to start the final confrontation with the Satanic West is of little import.

The number one question: if they obtain nuclear weapons, will they then think they have a religious imperative to use them? If so, preemptive war is the only rational course of action.

Question number two, maybe it's really number one: Do we have the moral courage for such a course of action?