It's August 2023 and we still don't know what our congressional districts will look like for the 2024 election. We can thank the Democratic supermajority in the Legislature for crossing the line and gerrymandering the 2nd Congressional District beyond recognition.

This week, an amicus brief was filed by a consortium including election reform groups, redistricting experts and a retired chief Judge of the Court of Appeals. The brief, supporting no political party, provided detailed research and data regarding the CD2 map as adopted by the Legislature and the fairness test ordered by the State Supreme Court.

The fairness test is quite simple: first, does the map intend to entrench one party's power by diluting the votes of the other party; second, is the map successful; finally, do the mapmakers have any legitimate and nonpartisan justification for their adjustments.

The Citizens Redistricting Committee (for whom I worked, in full disclosure) accomplished a herculean task against almost insurmountable odds. You see, the Democratic leadership in the Legislature didn't really want a CRC. So, they gave the CRC the shortest possible window to complete its work, and a minuscule budget. Nevertheless, the CRC held meetings all over the state, engaged thousands of voters for input and retained experts to draw maps meeting federal guidelines for fairness and equality.

The CRC also submitted to the Legislature the controversial "People's Map" introduced by the far-left Center for Civic Policy. The reason behind the submission was the large number of people who came to public meetings and offered support for the map. The CRC's charter included incorporating public input into their maps.

The People's Map was a bad map that divided towns in CD2 and apportioned them among all three districts. A key caveat in the legislation creating the CRC was that the legislature could revise the maps submitted by the CRC or create maps of its own. For congressional districts, the legislature opted to take a bad map and make it worse.

We know the outcome. Eastern and southern cities were divided. Chaves County was split among three districts. Bernalillo County was also split into three different districts. The clear goal was to ensure Congresswoman Yvette Herrell would lose her seat. She did, by a razor-thin margin. The Republican Party of New Mexico filed a lawsuit to throw out the map. The Supreme Court has directed the Fifth District Court to rule on the suit by October 1.

I am not a lawyer, much less a judge, but here are some highlights from the amicus brief filed August 14:

  • The parties submitting the amicus brief ran a computer simulation comparing 1,000 different possible maps to calculate probable election outcomes dating back to the 2016 election. 91% of the maps resulted in two Democratic Congressional representatives, one Republican. Only 8% of the possible maps resulted in three Democratic representatives. In other words, you had to really try to find a map that would give you that result.
  • The enacted map, if in place in every election since 2016, had a 100% probability in ensuring every Congressional seat would be Democratic. It would seem if the intent was to dilute Republican votes in CD2, the effort was successful.
  • Potential nonpartisan justifications to be considered include enhancing competition, uniting communities of interest and balancing urban and rural numbers. Arguments can be made for and against each of these justifications, as CD2 has flipped several times in the last two decades, the goal of uniting Barelas and South Valley Hispanic communities with those in Roswell and Hobbs is undefined, and the merits of urban and rural number adjustments could be outweighed by partisan purposes in diluting rural votes with urban ones.

Regardless of the outcome of the lawsuit, New Mexicans deserve to choose their elected officials. Under our current system, our legislators are choosing their voters through blatant gerrymandering. Please support an independent redistricting commission when the legislation comes before the Legislature in coming sessions.

Merritt Hamilton Allen is a PR executive and former Navy officer. She appears regularly as a panelist on NM PBS and is a frequent guest on News Radio KKOB. A Republican, she lives amicably with her Democratic husband north of I-40 where they run one head of dog, and two of cat. She can be reached at news.ind.merritt@gmail.com .

Content on the Beat

WARNING: All articles and photos with a byline or photo credit are copyrighted to the author or photographer. You may not use any information found within the articles without asking permission AND giving attribution to the source. Photos can be requested and may incur a nominal fee for use personally or commercially.

Disclaimer: If you find errors in articles not written by the Beat team but sent to us from other content providers, please contact the writer, not the Beat. For example, obituaries are always provided by the funeral home or a family member. We can fix errors, but please give details on where the error is so we can find it. News releases from government and non-profit entities are posted generally without change, except for legal notices, which incur a small charge.

NOTE: If an article does not have a byline, it was written by someone not affiliated with the Beat and then sent to the Beat for posting.

Images: We have received complaints about large images blocking parts of other articles. If you encounter this problem, click on the title of the article you want to read and it will take you to that article's page, which shows only that article without any intruders. 

New Columnists: The Beat continues to bring you new columnists. And check out the old faithfuls who continue to provide content.

Newsletter: If you opt in to the Join GCB Three Times Weekly Updates option above this to the right, you will be subscribed to email notifications with links to recently posted articles.

Submitting to the Beat

Those new to providing news releases to the Beat are asked to please check out submission guidelines at https://www.grantcountybeat.com/about/submissions. They are for your information to make life easier on the readers, as well as for the editor.

Advertising: Don't forget to tell advertisers that you saw their ads on the Beat.

Classifieds: We have changed Classifieds to a simpler option. Check periodically to see if any new ones have popped up. Send your information to editor@grantcountybeat.com and we will post it as soon as we can. Instructions and prices are on the page.

Editor's Notes

It has come to this editor's attention that people are sending information to the Grant County Beat Facebook page. Please be aware that the editor does not regularly monitor the page. If you have items you want to send to the editor, please send them to editor@grantcountybeat.com. Thanks!

Here for YOU: Consider the Beat your DAILY newspaper for up-to-date information about Grant County. It's at your fingertips! One Click to Local News. Thanks for your support for and your readership of Grant County's online news source—www.grantcountybeat.com

Feel free to notify editor@grantcountybeat.com if you notice any technical problems on the site. Your convenience is my desire for the Beat.  The Beat totally appreciates its readers and subscribers!  

Compliance: Because you are an esteemed member of The Grant County Beat readership, be assured that we at the Beat continue to do everything we can to be in full compliance with GDPR and pertinent US law, so that the information you have chosen to give to us cannot be compromised.